top of page

A Significant Win for Mining Giants in Union Legal Battle

In a landmark decision, major mining companies embroiled in a multi-employer bargaining test case have successfully obtained access to a comprehensive summary of legal advice given to Professionals Australia. This development comes after the union inadvertently undermined its claim to privilege by broadly sharing a PowerPoint slide that included the legal advice.

A Significant Win for Mining Giants in Union Legal Battle
A Significant Win for Mining Giants in Union Legal Battle

Background of the Case

The dispute involves several black coal mining employers—Peabody Energy, Glencore, Whitehaven, Delta Coal, and Ulan Coal Mines Ltd—who are resisting a union bid for a single interest employer authorisation under s248 of the Fair Work Act. The employers sought access to unredacted communications to bolster their case against the union's application.

The Decision

Deputy Presidents Peter Hampton and Judith Wright, alongside Commissioner Alana Matheson, ruled that the union's extensive distribution of the PowerPoint slide effectively waived its privilege. The slide, developed by a senior legal officer within the Collieries Staff division of Professionals Australia, was intended to convey external legal advice to union members during a meeting.

The bench highlighted that the union did not take significant steps to restrict access to the slide or to ensure recipients understood its privileged status. As a result, the slide was shared broadly among union members, thereby compromising its privileged nature.

Limited Access to Other Documents

While the mining companies gained access to the unredacted PowerPoint slide, their request for an unredacted email containing similar legal advice was denied. The email, sent by a union organiser to a single delegate for internal decision-making, was deemed not to play a meaningful role in informing the broader employee base.

Implications for the Mining Industry

This ruling is a significant victory for the mining companies, as it strengthens their position against the union’s push for a single interest employer authorisation. Peabody Energy had previously expressed serious concerns about the potential implications of such an application on the industry, fearing that it would force different mines operated by competitors into a single industrial agreement.

Union's Stance

The Collieries Staff and Officials Association, representing over 200 deputies, shift engineers, control room officers, and undermanagers, has emphasised the importance of its application in improving and standardising conditions across the mining sector. The union is advocating for several benefits, including the payout of personal leave upon termination and redundancy pay at three weeks per year, among others.

Looking Ahead

This case highlights the delicate balance between maintaining legal privilege and the need for transparency in union communications. The mining companies' victory underscores the importance of careful management of privileged information in legal disputes, particularly in the complex landscape of industrial relations.

As the case progresses, it will be crucial to monitor how these developments impact the broader mining industry and the future of multi-employer bargaining legislation.

This case, formally cited as Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia v Great Southern Energy Pty Ltd T/A Delta Coal, Whitehaven Coal Mining Ltd, Peabody Energy Australia Coal Pty Ltd, Ulan Coal Mines Ltd [2024] FWCFB 266 (28 May 2024), sets a significant precedent in the ongoing dialogue between unions and employers in Australia.

9 views0 comments


bottom of page