top of page

Navigating Workplace Rights: A Call to Action from an Employsure Manager’s Experience

In the bustling corridors of the workplace, where career aspirations breathe life, the intersection of professional advancement and parental duties often creates challenging scenarios. This is reflected in a poignant legal battle involving an Employsure manager, whose aspirations for career progression were seemingly stifled due to her parental responsibilities.

The manager, part of the Employsure team since 2016, faced a critical juncture during her parental leave. Despite previous discussions regarding a promotion, her return to work was shadowed by an unexpected decision. Upon applying for the advertised head of events position during her leave, she discovered that the role had been given to an external candidate, selected for their extensive seminar experience.

Navigating Workplace Rights: A Call to Action from an Employsure Manager’s Experience
Navigating Workplace Rights: A Call to Action from an Employsure Manager’s Experience

This decision sparked not only surprise but deep disappointment for the manager, who had anticipated stepping into a role that reflected her years of dedication and expertise. The company’s choice seemed to overshadow her existing contributions and potential, raising questions about the broader implications of workplace rights and parental leave.

This incident has escalated to a legal challenge, with the manager accusing Employsure of unlawful adverse action under s342 of the Fair Work Act, alleging discrimination based on her parental status and the exercise of her workplace rights.

Her claim highlights a disturbing possibility: that her career trajectory was altered and her professional expectations thwarted, not just personally but potentially as a broader pattern affecting others within the organisation.

The stakes are high, not only in terms of career progression but also in financial terms and personal well-being. The manager is now seeking compensation for the salary difference had she been promoted, alongside $50,000 for non-economic losses due to the alleged unlawful actions.

As this case unfolds in the Federal Circuit and Family Court, it serves as a critical reminder of the need for vigilance and advocacy in protecting employment rights, especially concerning parental leave and discrimination. For those interested in the intricate details of this case and the legal arguments presented, I encourage you to explore the full court decision available on []( (Sara Di Maggio v Employsure Pty Ltd, SYG1019/2022).

This case not only underscores the challenges individuals face but also acts as a catalyst for broader discussions and actions towards equitable and fair treatment in the workplace. It beckons us, as advocates and members of the workforce, to reflect on our roles in fostering an environment where career aspirations and parental responsibilities are not at odds but are part of a cohesive and supportive workplace culture.

Readers, I invite you to delve deeper into the specifics of this case and join in the conversation about how we can collectively ensure that the rights of all employees are upheld, and their professional aspirations supported, regardless of their personal responsibilities.

6 views0 comments


bottom of page