top of page

Understanding the Intricacies of Unfair Dismissal Claims in the Fair Work Commission

In a recent development within the Fair Work Commission, a long-standing unfair dismissal case has once again been brought into the spotlight, underscoring the challenges faced in disputes involving health-related absences from work. The case of Sophia Baker vs. Bodhicorp Pty Ltd ATF The Gadens Service Trust No 2 T/A Gadens Lawyers Brisbane, has been under consideration for nearly six years, highlighting the complexities of unfair dismissal proceedings in the Fair Work Commission.

Understanding the Intricacies of Unfair Dismissal Claims in the Fair Work Commission
Understanding the Intricacies of Unfair Dismissal Claims in the Fair Work Commission

Sophia Baker’s unfair dismissal claim commenced after her termination in September 2018 for failing to comply with a request to attend an independent medical examination (IME), mandated by her employer due to her extended absence from work owing to severe health concerns. Baker’s refusal was predicated on her belief that the request was both unlawful and unreasonable, despite the Fair Work Commission consistently ruling that such examinations can be a lawful and reasonable request from an employer under certain circumstances.

Since filing her unfair dismissal claim, Baker has encountered numerous adjournments and has requested multiple extensions, primarily justified by her ongoing health issues. These extensions have been critically examined by the Fair Work Commission, which has had to balance the need for procedural fairness with the importance of resolving matters in a timely manner to avoid prejudice against either party involved in the unfair dismissal case.

Deputy President Nicholas Lake of the Fair Work Commission recently addressed the matter, emphasizing that the continuous delays have potentially moved beyond the realm of reasonable accommodation and could be viewed as vexatious. He highlighted that the Fair Work Commission has afforded Baker every reasonable opportunity for fairness but stressed that further delays would neither serve the interests of harmonious workplace relations nor the principles of expedient justice as upheld by the Fair Work Commission.

The Deputy President pointed out that Baker’s ongoing inability to comply with the Fair Work Commission's processes, including her repeated failures to submit necessary documentation in a timely manner, suggests a pattern that might extend these proceedings unnecessarily. This stance is taken seriously by the Fair Work Commission, as it could set a concerning precedent for future unfair dismissal claims.

In terms of the unfair dismissal itself, the initial request by the employer for a medical examination was deemed by the Deputy President to be a lawful and reasonable step towards understanding Baker's medical situation and her capacity to return to work, which is a standard expectation in such cases within the Fair Work framework. This decision aligns with the Fair Work Commission’s ongoing commitment to ensuring that both employers and employees adhere to lawful and reasonable standards of conduct.

Looking forward, the Deputy President has clearly indicated that if Baker continues to seek further extensions or adjournments in her unfair dismissal claim, the Fair Work Commission will consider dismissing the case on the grounds of it being vexatiously extended, thus undermining the efficacy and fairness objectives of the Fair Work Commission.

For those interested in the full nuances of this unfair dismissal case and the principles applied by the Fair Work Commission, a detailed account is available on []( under the full case citation: Sophia (Marttea) Baker v Bodhicorp Pty Ltd ATF The Gadens Service Trust No 2 T/A Gadens Lawyers Brisbane (17 April 2024).

This case serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges and responsibilities facing parties involved in unfair dismissal claims within the Fair Work Commission. It underscores the importance of maintaining clear communication and adherence to procedural requirements to ensure fair and just outcomes in all unfair dismissal proceedings under the Fair Work Commission’s purview.

For further updates and insights into unfair dismissal claims and Fair Work practices, keep an eye on our blog and subscribe to our newsletter.

4 views0 comments


bottom of page